T. Kostenbader: Mumias Anwalt fordert Anhörung die Aussage des wirklichen Polizistenmörders

Von: „Steve Bloom“  sblm@earthlink.net
Betreff: FW: PRESS RELEASE: MUMIA¹S ATTORNEYS DEMAND SUPREME COURT HEAR TESTIMONY…
Datum: Samstag, 31. August 2002
  
 —–Original Message—–
 From: Tracy Kostenbader [mailto: tracytoast@earthlink.net ]
 Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002
 Subject: PRESS RELEASE: MUMIA¹S ATTORNEYS DEMAND SUPREME COURT HEAR
 TESTIMONY…
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
 MUMIA¹S ATTORNEYS DEMAND
 SUPREME COURT HEAR TESTIMONY
 FROM THE MAN WHO SHOT DANIEL FAULKNER.
 PHILADELPHIA. Attorneys for death row journalist Mumia Abu-Jamal  filed theirappeal brief in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court  on Tuesday, August 27,2002  The appeal brief argues that Jamal is the innocent victim of a frame-up by  corrupt police and organized crime and demands his immediate release. The  attorneys are asking the court to invoke a little-used procedure to itself  hear testimony under oath from ex-mob hitman Arnold Beverly, who swears  that he was hired to shoot and kill Police  Officer Daniel  Faulkner and Jamal  had nothing to do with the shooting. Beverly states in a videotape of his  confession that he will testify in any court. Jamal¹s attorneys have  declined to disclose Beverly¹s whereabouts, stating only that he is  ³underground² but has promised to come to court to testify whenever he is  given the chance to do so.
 .
Jamal¹s appeal is also based on the sworn statement of Court Stenographer  Terri Maurer-Carter who states that, at the time of Jamal¹s trial in 1982,  she heard the trial judge, Albert Sabo, say in reference to Jamal: ³Yeah,  and I¹m going to help Œem fry the n****r!² According to Jamal¹s attorneys,  Sabo, who died earlier this year, never denied under oath having made the  racist statement attributed to him  by Maurer-Carter. In their brief,  Jamal¹s attorneys excoriate Common Pleas Judge Pamela Dembe for  ruling thatSabo¹s racism was irrelevant and that Jamal had no right to an impartial  judge, comparing her ruling to the pre-Civil War ³Dred  Scott decision² in  which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Scott, a Black slave suing for his  freedom, ³had no ights the white man is bound to respect.²
 .
Prominent Los Angeles attorney Mike Yamamoto, who was named ³Defense  Attorney of the Year² by the Criminal Justice  Section of the L.A. County  Bar, and is a member of the House of Delegates of the American Bar  Association,  filed an ³amicus² (friend of the court) brief in support of  Jamal on behalf of unions from around the world, including International  Lonshore &  Warehouse Union Local 10 (San Francisco),  International LongshoreAssociation Local 1422 (Charleston), National Association of  Letter CarriersGolden Gate Chapter (San Francisco), National Union of Journalists (United  Kingdom), and Independent Local Unions ³Zahyst² and ³Uspih²  (Kiev, Ukraine).The Yamamoto brief argues that Mumia is innocent based upon an  independentreview of the evidence.
 .
Denver attorneys Watson Gallegher and Rich Garcia, representing the Rocky  Mountains Human Rights Law Group,  filed an amicus brief in support of  Jamal, arguing that international human rights law requires the  Pennsylvaniacourts to hear the evidence which proves that Jamal is innocent, including  the confession of Arnold Beverly.
Philadelphia attorney Michael Coard is local counsel on the amicus briefs.  Mumia Abu-Jamal is represented by British barrister Nick Brown, Chicago  attorney Marlene Kamish, Los Angeles attorney Eliot Lee Grossman, and  Philadelphia attorney J. Michael Farrell.
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
 Eliot Grossman (626) 943-1945, innjustice1066@yahoo.com
 Mike Farrell (215) 925-1105; jmfarrell@earthlink.net