Hallo Michael,
vielen Dank für diese wichtige Information. Noch ist ja nicht alles klar, aber Mumias Recht auf eine Anhörung ist NICHT verfallen, weil er gerade noch rechtzeitig Widerspruch einlegen konnte, anders als in der Pressemitteilung aus den USA vor einigen Tagen und gestern in der jW zunächst gemeldet wurde. Das ist erst mal sehr gut.
Demnächst bestimmt mehr zu diesen miesen Tricks der Justiz, die hart daran arbeiten, Mumias Zellenschlüssel für immer weg zu werfen.
Als erste Reaktion wäre es bestimmt ein gute Idee, Mumia zu schreiben. Das würde die Behörden daran erinnern, dass sie immer – auch jetzt – unter Beobachtung stehen.Alle Details für Post an Mumia gibt es hier http://
Mit solidarischen Grüßen
Free Mumia Berlin
Posteingangsbearbeiter der Nacht
——————————————————
Hierüber gab es einige Verwirrung, und auch jetzt ist noch nicht alles klar. Hier die Einschätzung Linn Washingtons, der in direktem Kontakt mit einigen der Protagonistinnen und Protagonisten steht.The latest from ThisCantBeHappening!:
The Secret Scheme To Sabotage Abu-Jamal’s Appeal Rights
By Linn Washington, Jr.
Mumia Abu-Jamal, the internationally recognized American political prisoner, thwarted a Philadelphia judge’s secretive court order that could have eliminated his future appeal rights when he filed a last- minute motion on August 23rd challenging that order sentencing him to life-without-parole.Most supporters and detractors of Abu-Jamal had been expecting the formal conversion of his controversial death sentence to life-without-parole in the wake of a federal appeals court’s second and final rejection of requests from Philadelphia prosecutors to keep
Abu-Jamal on death row back in April 2011.What was unexpected by Abu-Jamal supporters were the procedures surrounding the secretive court order, which appears to have violated a number of Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Abu-Jamal’s Pro Se Motion for Post Sentence Relief and Reconsideration of Sentence referenced Rule 720 of Pa’s Criminal Procedure which states in part that defendants shall “have the right” to make post-sentence motion but that motion must be filed “no later than 10 days after imposition of sentence.”
That secretly issued resentencing order occurred on August 13, 2012, exactly ten days before Abu-Jamal filed his motion.
If that ten-day filing period had expired, undiscovered due to secrecy-shrouded issuance of the resentencing order about which no public notice or notice to Abu-Jamal and his legal team, his legal ability to challenge his continued confinement would have been damagee, including his probable loss of future appeal rights.
Court rules and common courtesy require notice of court actions — both pending actually taken.
“This is the same backdoor stuff that’s always done to him,” Mumia attorney Rachel Wolkenstein said during an interview outside of Philadelphia’s Criminal Justice Center after delivering Abu-Jamal’s motion.
Wolkenstein, who has worked on Abu-Jamal’s case for over two decades, uncovered that secretly issued judicial order.
She became aware of it during a routine inspection of Philadelphia court records, where she was checking to see when a resentencing would occur.
Wolkenstein immediately informed Abu-Jamal and his legal team, all of whom were unaware of the order.
For the rest of this article by LINN WASHINGTON, JR. in ThisCantBeHappening!, the new independent Project Censored Award-winning online alternative newspaper, please go to: http://www.thiscantbehappening.net/node/1294